Livestorm
A webinar platform published by Livestorm SAS in Lyon. The site footer also names Livestorm Inc.; the link between the two entities is not disclosed.
In pictures
WebThese notes concern product use. The sovereignty score follows its own rubric.
Does it fit your needs?
These features are separate from the sovereignty score. Limits depend on the chosen plan.
- Available plan
- Free plan and paid optionsSource ↗
- Free allowance
- Free plan announced, limits not publishedSource ↗
- iPhone / Android
- To verify
- Maximum participants
- Up to 3000 per event, paid plansSource ↗
- Guests without accounts
- To verify
- Screen sharing
- To verify
- Recording
- To verify
Documents checked on Oct 8, 2026
The essentials
| Publisher based in | France |
|---|---|
| Access model | Free plan and paid options |
| Source consulted on | Oct 8, 2026 |
| Legal headquarters | 20.6/25 |
| Hosting | 15/25 |
| Ownership | 15/25 |
| Technical dependencies | 15/25 |
Access models are indicative. Refer to the official website for current prices and terms.
Check before choosing
A publisher’s country does not establish its independence. Ownership, subprocessors, data location and technical dependencies need a separate assessment.
Plan your switch
Test with non-sensitive data first. Check import and export options, essential features and plan terms before migrating.
Plan my first trial →How the score is calculated
The publishing company is French. The site also names a Livestorm Inc. entity without explaining the link, leaving the control chain open. Hosting and dependencies are not documented.
Calculation updated 8 October 2026 · method 0.6
Your score, step by step
- Points earned on documented criteria
- 14 / 14
- Rubric points still undocumented
- 86 / 100
This percentage measures how much of the rubric is documented, not points earned or the probability of sovereignty.
Unknown criteria retain 60% of their weight in the provisional score. This calculation allowance is not presented as a verified fact. Wholly unknown criteria remain marked “To document”. New evidence can raise or lower the score.
Limited documentation: this score is an initial guide. Review the missing criteria before comparing.
Understand this score ↗We start at 100 and subtract points lost on documented criteria. Unknown criteria incur a deduction of 40% of their weight: 25 undocumented points therefore cost 10 points, rather than 25. We round only the final score. This reserve is an editorial convention, not evidence about missing information. Documentation coverage is shown separately.
Initial review of public documents. Publisher statements are identified in the dossier; they are not an independent audit.
Legal headquarters20.6/25
Contribution to the score: 25 − 0 − 4.4 = 20.6 / 25 · 14/25 documented
1.1 · Principal establishment
14/14Livestorm SAS is a French simplified joint-stock company with its seat in Lyon.
1.2 · Chain of control
—/11To document Not established in the sources reviewed.
Hosting15/25
Contribution to the score: 25 − 0 − 10 = 15 / 25 · 0/25 documented
2.1 · Production data
—/10To document Not established in the sources reviewed.
2.2 · Backups and logs
—/6To document Not established in the sources reviewed.
2.3 · Infrastructure operator
—/6To document Not established in the sources reviewed.
2.4 · Delivery and edge
—/3To document Not established in the sources reviewed.
Ownership15/25
Contribution to the score: 25 − 0 − 10 = 15 / 25 · 0/25 documented
3.1 · Ownership control
—/12To document Not established in the sources reviewed.
3.2 · Structural transparency
—/7To document Not established in the sources reviewed.
3.3 · Protection against a change of control
—/6To document Not established in the sources reviewed.
Technical dependencies15/25
Contribution to the score: 25 − 0 − 10 = 15 / 25 · 0/25 documented
4.1 · Critical service dependencies
—/10To document Not established in the sources reviewed.
4.2 · Distribution and access
—/5To document Not established in the sources reviewed.
4.3 · Openness and portability
—/6To document Not established in the sources reviewed.
4.4 · Independent verification
—/4To document Not established in the sources reviewed.
Legal transparency
Nothing publishedWhat the publisher discloses about requests from authorities. This does not count towards the score.
We would like to score how this publisher reports on requests from authorities. It publishes nothing on the subject, so we do not score it. The day it does, it will appear here.
User experiences
What worked for you and what was missing. Reviews concern product use and do not change its sovereignty score.
Reviews will open soon. You can prepare yours here; it will not be sent.
Prepare my review
When reviews open, a verified email address will be required. Each review will be moderated before publication. One editable review per person and product. Criticism is welcome; insults, spam and private data are not.
The draft stays on your device if you choose to save it. A verified address is not proof of purchase or use.
In the same category
Explore all
kMeet
SwitzerlandInfomaniak video meetings in the browser. The provider states communications use its Swiss servers.
alfaview
GermanyVideo rooms and collaboration tools developed in Karlsruhe.
Tixeo
FranceFrench video conferencing for organisations, offered in the cloud or on dedicated infrastructure.